Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-04-11 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-04-11 Senate Journal Page 3159 SB 289 Senator Frank requested that the reconsideration on CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 289(FIN) An Act relating to runaways, other minors, and their families or legal custodians; and amending Rule 7, Alaska Delinquency Rules be taken up. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 289(FIN) was before the Senate on reconsideration. 1996-04-11 Senate Journal Page 3160 SB 289 Senator Frank moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 1. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senators Frank, Duncan offered Amendment No. 1 : Page 4, line 11: Delete "or for believing that the minor is a child in need of aid" Page 4, line 13: Delete "or child-in-need-of-aid" Page 4, line 15, following "petition.": Insert "If the court finds probable cause to believe the child is a child in need of aid, it shall proceed under AS 47.10.142(e) and order the minor to remain in the placement chosen for the minor by the department or the minor's parent or guardian, as applicable." Senator Frank moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Without objection, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 289(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: Shall CS SENATE BILL NO. 289(FIN) am An Act relating to runaways, other minors, and their families or legal custodians; and amending Rule 7, Alaska Delinquency Rules pass the Senate? The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 289(FIN) am Third Reading - On Reconsideration Court Rule Change YEAS: 20 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff 1996-04-11 Senate Journal Page 3161 SB 289 and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 289(FIN) am passed the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the Court Rule change. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.